Friday, March 20, 2020

Legislation and Legalization essays

Legislation and Legalization essays A Study of the Inconsistency of the Application of the Death Penalty A well-dressed, young-looking businessman casually walks into a soaring skyscraper filled with over a thousand people who are all going about their normal lives, carrying out their daily routines. The businessman holds his briefcase in one hand and clenches his other hand into a tight fist. Nobody gives him a second glance as he walks through the tall, glass entrance doors. He looks perfectly normal to everyone in the building. However, these people do not realize that this mans typical-looking briefcase hides a considerable stockpile of high powered explosives. He calmly boards one of the buildings many elevators and presses the button labeled 30, the exact middle floor. He exits the elevator, impassively sets the briefcase on the floor, and returns to the lobby. Two minutes later, the bomb detonates. The blast reaches nearly fifteen of the buildings sixty floors, killing nearly three hundred people and injuring many more. A witness standing a block away from the building notices the businessman suspiciously walking away from the scene with no expression of fear or panic, and he chases after him. Later, the man pleads guilty to charges of first degree murder. He is sentenced to life in prison without parole. Why is he not given a sentence of death? Why is he not relieved of the right to live for the horrible crime he has committed? The reason is that the crime is committed in the state of Massachusetts, one of the 12 states in the United States of America that do not allow the death penalty as a form of punishment. This inconsistency in legislation causes many serious problems with justice, deterrence, and retribution. The primary problems lie, obviously, in the fact that some states do not allow the death penalty. These twelve states are Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, ...

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

The Meaning of Ça in French

The Meaning of Ça in French In French, the word  Ãƒ §a  means it or that. Its a very simple word, but its also a very useful word that every French student needs to add to their vocabulary because its used in a number of common expressions. A brief lesson will introduce you to this word and the many ways you can use it. The Definition of Ça The pronunciation of à §a is sa. The cà ©dille (or cedilla) is used on the letter c  to ensure that it has a soft sound. Without it, the a would automatically give the c  a hard sound like it does in the word cat. Ça is an informal word that is actually a contraction of cela, which means it.  Ãƒâ€¡a  is also used to replace the more formal  ceci, which means this. These derivations are why  Ãƒ §a  is often defined as it, that, or this. Ça  is also an indefinite demonstrative pronoun. Unlike some other pronouns, it does not change based on the subject or the number of the sentence. This means that there are no other forms of  Ãƒ §a, which makes using it in sentences a little easier. Using  Ãƒâ€¡a  in Common Expressions Due to its meaning and usefulness as a pronoun,  Ãƒ §a  is found in a number of common expressions and phrases. Even though it is informal, the French language uses it often. Cest à §a  - Thats it, thats right Ça alors  - How about that Ça va ?  - Hows it going? Ça marche !  - That works! Okay! Quest-ce que à §a ?  -  What is it/that?   Cest quoi à §a ? - Whats that? Quest-ce que à §a veut dire ? - What does that mean? Ça maide beaucoup - It helps me a lot. Its interesting to note that the phrase, Ça cest une bonne idà ©e. is redundant in its use of that. Since cest is included along with à §a, it literally translates to, That (that) is a good idea. Notice how when the two words are reversed in Cest à §a above, the translation makes perfect sense. This is just another tricky thing to look out for when switching between the two languages.